Comments on: Fred Thompson adopts the Reid Doctrine http://nukegingrich.com/2009/11/19/fred-thompson-adopts-the-reid-doctrine/ Thu, 31 May 2012 03:52:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: swampie http://nukegingrich.com/2009/11/19/fred-thompson-adopts-the-reid-doctrine/#comment-88424 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:28:29 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=7352#comment-88424 Unh hunh. I agree with Fred but think it was poorly worded. The words he was looking for was that “our young men and women are being systematically screwed over by a government that doesn’t want to count their votes and wants them dead”.

Edit: And what n2l said.

]]> By: no2liberals http://nukegingrich.com/2009/11/19/fred-thompson-adopts-the-reid-doctrine/#comment-88421 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:45:29 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=7352#comment-88421 I’m not sticking up for Fred, but he has a valid point.
I do, however, think his choice of words were poorly considered. Instead of saying “this war has been lost,” which I assume he means by B-HØ, saying “this war has been forfeited due to lack of interest and vision” would have been more accurate.
Øbama has forfeited any chance at victory, a concept he is not comfortable with, by his own words. McChrystal made his request in August, and that request wasn’t for the then immediate future, but for the spring offensive by the Towliebans. When the snow melts, the fit, rested, and rearmed Towlies will be pouring into the valleys. It is already too late if our alleged president gives his okay, as that number of troops and logistics takes months to organize, cut orders, order supplies, train and reform units.
This war has been forfeited by a feckless leader who either wants this nation to fail, or is incapable of understanding what a malfunction of a leader he truly is.
Actually, I think both are equally true.

]]>