Comments on: The Banned of Brothers http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:33:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Nodrog http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85114 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:13:22 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85114 Well, that last implied threat will have the desired effect of shutting me up. Buh bye, Mike C. Give my worst to your grouchy conservative buddies – I’ll certainly acknowledge you’re no Rayra.

]]> By: Mike C. http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85105 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:55:24 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85105 Whatever floats your boat. But you should realise that I have been fighting for you. Unlike most of my compatriots, I am fully convinced that you do indeed have the permission of your immediate supervisor to utilize your taxpayer-subsidized IP address (and probably computer as well) to do this stuff instead of actually, like, working.

Breadcrumbs, Gordon. Breadcrumbs.

]]> By: Nodrog http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85104 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:44:11 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85104 Mike C., I admit, the thrill of the forbidden, and all that … But I’ll be checking on the Grouchy Conservative Pundits shenanigans every once in a while, just to remain suitably appalled.

]]> By: Mike C. http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85103 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:27:13 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85103 Um, Gordon ? We have a log of how many times you attempted to get in, you know. For somebody that thinks he isn’t missing much, you sure were a persisistent little bugger there for a while. As to weather or not you were worth listening to, as I pointed out, that was settled ages ago. You lost. As to the Tiller thread, frankly I don’t know, I didn’t read it.

]]> By: swampie http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85102 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:09:26 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85102 Heh. Thank you for making our point about you.

]]> By: Nodrog http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85100 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:44:46 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85100 So at your new address glorifying the death of Dr. Tiller is OK, but listening to the Nodrog is not?

Guess I’m not missing much …

]]> By: Rigpa http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85067 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:32:39 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85067 From here on out, I will call him the Booga-booga Man.

I waited ’till you got back. No use messin’ up the house.

Thoughts on the new banner…

]]> By: Mike C. http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85066 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:31:29 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85066 Oh, come on, Gordon (assuming you are one of the Gordons), you were banned at GCP ages ago You know it and so does everybody else. For some reason you thought a change of address would affect that ?

Whining is not known as a particularly strong debating tactic.

]]> By: nuke http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85065 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:08:06 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85065 So are you the voice of diversity, or the voice of profound wisdom?

Likely the former, as wisdom would dictate at least a small amount of reticence before offering advice to a total stranger.

In either case, you have not been banned here.

]]> By: SwampWoman http://nukegingrich.com/2009/06/18/the-banned-of-brothers/#comment-85063 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:57:31 +0000 http://nukegingrich.com/?p=6402#comment-85063 Fuck off, Gordon. Nobody wants to waste their time reading your opinions.

]]>