<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax cuts for the rich, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuke&#8217;s News and Views &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Belmont Debate</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuke&#8217;s News and Views &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Belmont Debate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for all.  Sphere: Related [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for all.  Sphere: Related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmont Debate &#171; Pike County Times</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belmont Debate &#171; Pike County Times]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmont Debate &#171; nn&#38;v</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belmont Debate &#171; nn&#38;v]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-81152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a poorly played piece of class warfare, but it does speak to the need of the Right to put the TCFTR meme to bed once and for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Huckabee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tax cuts for the rich, part 2 &#8212; Update: Dobson endorses Huck</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tax cuts for the rich, part 2 &#8212; Update: Dobson endorses Huck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fortyfour wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUPDATE: James Dobson endorses Huckabee Decision Week for the Republican Primary has brought some interesting, although not completely unexpected developments with the withdrawal of Romney, the rise of McCain, and the near unanimous chorus in the punditeria that &#8220;it&#8217;s over.&#8221; Also heard from the the pundit class is that Huckabee has had his 15 minutes, but he must not be the VP choice. It may come as a surprise to many, but Huck is not running to be McCain&#8217;s VP. He hasn&#8217;t been running to spoil it for Romney. Or Thompson. Or anyone else. He&#8217;s been running to win. Period. And, with the time and money short, the delegate math becoming nearly impossible, and the odds growing longer than ever, Huck is facing the hard decision of either withdrawing from the race, or performing a near miracle at C-PAC on Saturday morning. If there is one candidate in the race, on either [&#8230;] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fortyfour wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUPDATE: James Dobson endorses Huckabee Decision Week for the Republican Primary has brought some interesting, although not completely unexpected developments with the withdrawal of Romney, the rise of McCain, and the near unanimous chorus in the punditeria that &#8220;it&#8217;s over.&#8221; Also heard from the the pundit class is that Huckabee has had his 15 minutes, but he must not be the VP choice. It may come as a surprise to many, but Huck is not running to be McCain&#8217;s VP. He hasn&#8217;t been running to spoil it for Romney. Or Thompson. Or anyone else. He&#8217;s been running to win. Period. And, with the time and money short, the delegate math becoming nearly impossible, and the odds growing longer than ever, Huck is facing the hard decision of either withdrawing from the race, or performing a near miracle at C-PAC on Saturday morning. If there is one candidate in the race, on either [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert D</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, yes it is. A fact that should be clear to me by now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes it is. A fact that should be clear to me by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuke</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nuke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s why they play the game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s why they play the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert D</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/tax-cuts-for-the-rich-part-2/#comment-76136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

