<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax cuts for the rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no2liberals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way things are going, I hope it goes to the National Convention, before the GOP nominee is determined.  It will give the leftards and their friends in the media less time to zero in on the nominee, and it will give more time for the GOP to get the message I and other conservatives are sending, and maybe enough delegates committed to Mc will mysteriously change, and go to Mitt or Mike, knocking Mc out.
Once again, I will repeat my position and principles, &lt;b&gt;I am a conservative, not a Republican.&lt;/b&gt;  If it were up to me, I wouldn&#039;t even care about the election, Texas would be a sovereign nation of it&#039;s own, but since I don&#039;t see that happening, I have my principles to guide me, and unless the GOP offers a candidate that comes close to those principles, then they don&#039;t get my vote.  Do I really have to go over all the things Mc has opposed, tax cuts, second amendment, pro-life, and free speech?  Not to mention how he has shat upon the families of Viet Nam POW&#039;s.
Politics is self-interest, and if my interest aren&#039;t served by any of the candidates, then I have no one to vote for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way things are going, I hope it goes to the National Convention, before the GOP nominee is determined.  It will give the leftards and their friends in the media less time to zero in on the nominee, and it will give more time for the GOP to get the message I and other conservatives are sending, and maybe enough delegates committed to Mc will mysteriously change, and go to Mitt or Mike, knocking Mc out.<br />
Once again, I will repeat my position and principles, <b>I am a conservative, not a Republican.</b>  If it were up to me, I wouldn&#8217;t even care about the election, Texas would be a sovereign nation of it&#8217;s own, but since I don&#8217;t see that happening, I have my principles to guide me, and unless the GOP offers a candidate that comes close to those principles, then they don&#8217;t get my vote.  Do I really have to go over all the things Mc has opposed, tax cuts, second amendment, pro-life, and free speech?  Not to mention how he has shat upon the families of Viet Nam POW&#8217;s.<br />
Politics is self-interest, and if my interest aren&#8217;t served by any of the candidates, then I have no one to vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no2liberals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day, before I quit listening to him and all the other big name talk shows until after the GOP convention, Rush was admonishing a woman for expressing the exact same view as mine, and asked her to call him back if Mc does indeed win, so he can try and talk her out of her decision.  Then Rush proceeded with his bizarre notion that Mike is in cahoots with Mc, so Mitt won&#039;t win.  That is the most absurd thing I&#039;ve heard since Paul first learned to talk.  Then I noticed that other hosts and blogs were repeating the same nonsense.  So I said eff all of you, I listen for information and entertainment, not so I can be force fed the GOP establishments line of BS.  It&#039;s the GOP establishment that I am fed up with, they have taken us conservatives for granted far too long, and only learned their lesson when Reagan went around them to the American people, and won.  Since the freshman class of Republicans in 94, the conservative message has been continually down played, so the Republicans would have a chance to stay in power by drawing independents.  Screw them, I will not be taken advantage of, or told what to do or think, or who to vote for.  No one tells me what to do, not my friends, not talk show hosts, blogs, TV, and most certainly not the smug GOP establishment.
The GOP wants my vote, they have to earn it, the days of assuming I will vote their ticket just because, are over.
Of the three remaining candidates, in my view Mike is the only life long conservative with a record to prove it, Mitt is now conservative sounding with good business skills, and Mc is a glory seeking bully, that has lied all through the campaign, has lied about what he has done as Senator, and is now lying to Conservatives.  Conservatives aren&#039;t buying into it, either, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/favorables/election_2008_republican_candidates_running_in_2008_presidential_election&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this breakdown&lt;/a&gt; indicates, I ain&#039;t the only one that feels this way.  In fact, Ann Coulter said she would go a step further, and vote for Hillary if Mc gets it, an idea I toyed with and abandoned last week.
Looking at that same breakdown, it is clear why the establishment wants Mc, because for some bizarre reason, the poll shows Mc beating HRT or B-HO.  I don&#039;t care what the establishment wants anymore, they don&#039;t promote conservatism, and trot out a little bully that has pissed on conservative ideals for twenty years, then I say piss on them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day, before I quit listening to him and all the other big name talk shows until after the GOP convention, Rush was admonishing a woman for expressing the exact same view as mine, and asked her to call him back if Mc does indeed win, so he can try and talk her out of her decision.  Then Rush proceeded with his bizarre notion that Mike is in cahoots with Mc, so Mitt won&#8217;t win.  That is the most absurd thing I&#8217;ve heard since Paul first learned to talk.  Then I noticed that other hosts and blogs were repeating the same nonsense.  So I said eff all of you, I listen for information and entertainment, not so I can be force fed the GOP establishments line of BS.  It&#8217;s the GOP establishment that I am fed up with, they have taken us conservatives for granted far too long, and only learned their lesson when Reagan went around them to the American people, and won.  Since the freshman class of Republicans in 94, the conservative message has been continually down played, so the Republicans would have a chance to stay in power by drawing independents.  Screw them, I will not be taken advantage of, or told what to do or think, or who to vote for.  No one tells me what to do, not my friends, not talk show hosts, blogs, TV, and most certainly not the smug GOP establishment.<br />
The GOP wants my vote, they have to earn it, the days of assuming I will vote their ticket just because, are over.<br />
Of the three remaining candidates, in my view Mike is the only life long conservative with a record to prove it, Mitt is now conservative sounding with good business skills, and Mc is a glory seeking bully, that has lied all through the campaign, has lied about what he has done as Senator, and is now lying to Conservatives.  Conservatives aren&#8217;t buying into it, either, as <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/favorables/election_2008_republican_candidates_running_in_2008_presidential_election" rel="nofollow">this breakdown</a> indicates, I ain&#8217;t the only one that feels this way.  In fact, Ann Coulter said she would go a step further, and vote for Hillary if Mc gets it, an idea I toyed with and abandoned last week.<br />
Looking at that same breakdown, it is clear why the establishment wants Mc, because for some bizarre reason, the poll shows Mc beating HRT or B-HO.  I don&#8217;t care what the establishment wants anymore, they don&#8217;t promote conservatism, and trot out a little bully that has pissed on conservative ideals for twenty years, then I say piss on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swampie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was actually listening to talk radio when I heard Rush make (and explain) that comment. I thought it didn&#039;t make good sense then (unless you factor in that complaining is his way of making a living) and time hasn&#039;t improved my opinion of it any.  

Like many people in Florida, my family and I were registered Dems so that we could vote in the local elections because only Democrats were running for office. I often voted Republican in the national elections (and the gubernatorial elections). I didn&#039;t vote for Bush initially because I thought he wasn&#039;t conservative enough, but could not in good conscience vote for Al Gore, either.  

Luckily a very few more people in Florida decided that they could live with a certain lack of conservativism over the prospect of an Al Gore presidency, and thank the good Lord that they crossed over party lines to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually listening to talk radio when I heard Rush make (and explain) that comment. I thought it didn&#8217;t make good sense then (unless you factor in that complaining is his way of making a living) and time hasn&#8217;t improved my opinion of it any.  </p>
<p>Like many people in Florida, my family and I were registered Dems so that we could vote in the local elections because only Democrats were running for office. I often voted Republican in the national elections (and the gubernatorial elections). I didn&#8217;t vote for Bush initially because I thought he wasn&#8217;t conservative enough, but could not in good conscience vote for Al Gore, either.  </p>
<p>Luckily a very few more people in Florida decided that they could live with a certain lack of conservativism over the prospect of an Al Gore presidency, and thank the good Lord that they crossed over party lines to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no2liberals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swampie, you don&#039;t even listen to Rush so how would you know what he advocates?
Actually, Rush advocates just the opposite.
Oh, I&#039;ll be a part of the process, it&#039;s just if Mc wins, I will leave that particular ballot box blank, when I go vote.
I&#039;m a conservative, not a Republican, and if Mc wins, I won&#039;t have a candidate to vote for.  And I can&#039;t vote &lt;b&gt;against&lt;/b&gt; both of the party nominee&#039;s.  Voting for the lesser of two evils is a positive?  I don&#039;t think so.  At least we know with certainty what the donks will do, Mc could be even worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swampie, you don&#8217;t even listen to Rush so how would you know what he advocates?<br />
Actually, Rush advocates just the opposite.<br />
Oh, I&#8217;ll be a part of the process, it&#8217;s just if Mc wins, I will leave that particular ballot box blank, when I go vote.<br />
I&#8217;m a conservative, not a Republican, and if Mc wins, I won&#8217;t have a candidate to vote for.  And I can&#8217;t vote <b>against</b> both of the party nominee&#8217;s.  Voting for the lesser of two evils is a positive?  I don&#8217;t think so.  At least we know with certainty what the donks will do, Mc could be even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuke</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nuke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dang straight.
This is primary season.  Get out and work for your candidate.  It&#039;s looking more and more like we&#039;re going to have a brokered convention.  Whoever emerges from that battle will be a helluva lot better than either of the inexperienced candidates the donks are offering up]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang straight.<br />
This is primary season.  Get out and work for your candidate.  It&#8217;s looking more and more like we&#8217;re going to have a brokered convention.  Whoever emerges from that battle will be a helluva lot better than either of the inexperienced candidates the donks are offering up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swampie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If y&#039;all want to stay home and not be a part of the process, it is your perogative.  You don&#039;t get to complain about the consequences because you were part of the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If y&#8217;all want to stay home and not be a part of the process, it is your perogative.  You don&#8217;t get to complain about the consequences because you were part of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swampie</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swampie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh.  Yeah, I&#039;ve been arguing with people who are just going to pursue the lemming-like strategy advocated by Rush and stay home and not vote, and to hell with the country.  

Rush gets paid (and very well, too) to bitch and moan.  It would be in his best interests to have a Democrat back in the White House along with a Democrat-controlled congress and senate.  LOTS of bitching and moaning opportunities there!  As I don&#039;t make a dime from bitching and moaning, I&#039;ll have to pass on that strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  Yeah, I&#8217;ve been arguing with people who are just going to pursue the lemming-like strategy advocated by Rush and stay home and not vote, and to hell with the country.  </p>
<p>Rush gets paid (and very well, too) to bitch and moan.  It would be in his best interests to have a Democrat back in the White House along with a Democrat-controlled congress and senate.  LOTS of bitching and moaning opportunities there!  As I don&#8217;t make a dime from bitching and moaning, I&#8217;ll have to pass on that strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert D</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I meant that as a compliment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I meant that as a compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert D</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So giving up on Iraq is OK? I don&#039;t think so. We have to.....you know, nevermind, because if it doesn&#039;t bother you (after all I now about you) I should be a little less bothered by it too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So giving up on Iraq is OK? I don&#8217;t think so. We have to&#8230;..you know, nevermind, because if it doesn&#8217;t bother you (after all I now about you) I should be a little less bothered by it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2liberals</title>
		<link>http://nukegingrich.com/2008/02/02/tax-cuts-for-the-rich/#comment-75907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no2liberals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/?p=3053#comment-75907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is disturbing to think Mc is even this close to the top, but he would be a disaster.
Obambi can&#039;t beat HRT, but even if he does, he won&#039;t get much accomplished, other than bringing the troops home, unless the donks get a veto proof Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disturbing to think Mc is even this close to the top, but he would be a disaster.<br />
Obambi can&#8217;t beat HRT, but even if he does, he won&#8217;t get much accomplished, other than bringing the troops home, unless the donks get a veto proof Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

