This may be THE Flying Pig Moment of 2007.
The New York Times has published an editorial by MICHAEL E. O’HANLON and KENNETH M. POLLACK that reflects much of the cautious optimism that we’ve seen since the stabilization of Anbar and the ejection of AQI from Baqubah.
Yes, you read that correctly.
Here is an excerpt:
Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand: We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms. As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily “victory” but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with.
After the furnace-like heat, the first thing you notice when you land in Baghdad is the morale of our troops. In previous trips to Iraq we often found American troops angry and frustrated — many sensed they had the wrong strategy, were using the wrong tactics and were risking their lives in pursuit of an approach that could not work.
Today, morale is high. The soldiers and marines told us they feel that they now have a superb commander in Gen. David Petraeus; they are confident in his strategy, they see real results, and they feel now they have the numbers needed to make a real difference.
As they say……..Read it all
==================================================================================================
Trackposted to Perri Nelson’s Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Committees of Correspondence, third world county, DeMediacratic Nation, Right Truth, The World According to Carl, DragonLady’s World, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, High Desert Wanderer, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Filed under: 'War on Terrorism', iraq, military, News and politics










The FPM of 2007…so far.
I saw the story headline, and a caption, early this a.m., but didn’t feel like messing with bugmenot. Every body has been talking about it on talk radio, today.
Looks like some body forgot to check with Soros, before they ran the story.
These two writers work for the left leaning Brookings Institute, and according to Laura Ingraham’s staff, they view these writers as moderate to slightly left leaning, and therefore not bonded to the quitters caucus.
I saw the story and was heartened and disappointed at the same time. One I felt it was good to see positive troop related news. Sad due to knowing the spin would go where it has. “Doesn’t matter progress to late lets roll(over)” Off topic flying pig sqaudrons over Islamic jihadists mmm good psy-ops no ?
ooooo, I like the way you think. Hehe
I was just reading Dems are no shows at DLC, and it was explained thusly:
Yeah, I can see where it worked out really well for them, too.
This seems to be a good spot for this.
Hugh Hewitt interviews John Burns of the NYT.
And here we have a brief moment of lucidity by a Dhimmi, quickly followed by a disconnect from reality, at the end of the article.
Clyburn: Positive Report by Petraeus Could Split House Democrats on War.