Danny Bonaduce B-slaps 9/11 wacko

Posted on December 17, 2006 by nuke

RW has this video posted over at “Dancing Madly”.  It’s a hoot!

Filed under: 'War on Terrorism', Al Qaeda, Homeland Security, Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder

« She Had To Remove Her Hijab…To Find Her Strength! More on the Pun Thread »

48 Responses

  1. SwampWoman, on December 17th, 2006 at 5:43 pm Said:

    Way to go, Danny! Couldn’t have said it more eloquently myself.

    Reply
  2. no2liberals, on December 17th, 2006 at 5:53 pm Said:

    I don’t know which I despise more, ambush interviews, or self-important whacked-out liberals.
    I think it’s time to reach into the archives.
    There is no 9-11 conspiracy, you morons!
    Way to go Danny, hope you were able to spray some of your lunch in his LLL smug face.

    Reply
  3. David Drake, on December 17th, 2006 at 8:43 pm Said:

    john connor gets “pwned” by Danny B! Suh-weeet!

    Reply
  4. nuke, on December 17th, 2006 at 9:02 pm Said:

    Down Goes Conner,Down Goes Conner
    /in my best Howard Cosell impression

    Reply
  7. vimto1, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:18 am Said:

    That Seinfeld lampoon is veerrrrry clever!

    Nuke are you really in the running?

    Reply
  8. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:31 am Said:

    Newt can run, but he’s going to have quite a problem with female voters.

    Reply
  9. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:56 am Said:

    Not quite sure where to put this. Just something that I found interesting on more nuclear plants that China is building.

    Reply
  10. vimto1, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:59 am Said:

    Mmmm, we had a ‘back to basics’ progam headed up by the then PM John Major.

    It turns out that he was having exta marital Ugandan lessons from one Edwina ‘Salmonella’ Curry.

    Poor Mrs Major.

    Reply
  11. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 9:25 am Said:

    Well, there are some people that have the crazy idea that how you treat your family is indicative of your character. In that context, Newt is a real SOB. If he wouldn’t hesitate to screw over his family, what would he do to the nation?

    Reply
  12. vimto1, on December 18th, 2006 at 9:50 am Said:

    The French take the view that sex is neither here nor there in political life. We Brits are heading that way (though the working classes don’t feel so easy about the drift, and I am with them.

    I understand (from the UK so I may be wrong) that Newt (at least on the political stage) knows right from wrong and is a heavyweight.

    Reply
  13. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:05 am Said:

    Newt is a great writer and speaker; overall a brilliant man. Do I think he’s lived down his past enough to be electable? Not a chance.

    Reply
  14. vimto1, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:18 am Said:

    Sometimes the world needs flawed people who know what to do when the chips are down. Commeth the hour commeth the man? Churchill was a ‘has been’ and then… oh you know the history.

    Reply
  15. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:18 am Said:

    Nuke and N2L may disagree with me, of course (or should I say as usual, heh).

    Reply
  16. vimto1, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:31 am Said:

    Just leaving the office for the traffic jam home.

    Catch you later!

    Reply
  17. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:39 am Said:

    Yeah, I was actually thinking of Churchill’s character flaws when I was writing about Nuke. However (grin) Churchill never had divorce papers served on his wife when she was in hospital awaiting a cancer operation, or informed another wife by telephone that he was replacing her with a younger model he’d been having an affair with. In a close election, that’s gonna hurt.

    Reply
  18. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:40 am Said:

    Dang, NEWT! My fingers are getting all confused here and maybe I better concentrate on working.

    Reply
  19. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:48 am Said:

    BEIJING — North Korea defiantly declared itself a nuclear power Monday at the start of the first full international arms talks since its atomic test and threatened to increase its arsenal if its demands were not met.

    Reiterating those demands in its opening speech, the North said the United Nations must lift the sanctions imposed on the communist nation for its Oct. 9 nuclear test. It also said the United States must remove the financial restrictions that led the North to break off the six-nation negotiations 13 months ago.

    The North also said it wants a reactor built for it and help covering its energy needs in the meantime, according to a summary of the speech released by one of the delegations involved. Five nations are trying to persuade the North to abandon nuclear weapons — the United States, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia.

    Heh. Somebody needs to take that Dale Carnegie course about Winning Friends and Influencing People.

    Reply
  20. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 12:00 pm Said:

    High IQ children grow into vegetarians!

    There you go, proof that I ain’t nothin’ but a low-class dumbass carnivore.

    And for all those animal-hugging vegetarians out there, what exactly do you suppose would happen to all the nice little animals that are grown for their food value if everybody became a vegetarian? Yeah, baby, that’s right, extinction.

    Reply
  21. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 1:21 pm Said:

    Does Newt have some baggage? You bet, but even if he didn’t, the LLL would create some for him, just like they will any conservative. I don’t think that necessarily makes him unelectable. Besides that, even if he runs, and can’t win the nomination, he will push the other candidates to run as conservatives and not as squishies. Newt’s brain power is substantial, and his passion is undeniable, when he speaks.
    As for his romantic entanglements, no one has drowned in his car, and we certainly don’t know what the situation was with his wife, that was hospitalized when he informed her he wanted a divorce. I informed my ex I wanted a divorce when she was in the hospital…recovering from a miscarriage…from another man’s child. So in the absence of many personal details, which I’m not that interested in, I’m certainly not going to cast stones.

    Reply
  22. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 1:38 pm Said:

    N2L, I’m talking about the big election picture here. I know that his romantic entanglements won’t bother a lot of people; after all, Bill’s didn’t. In the primaries, though, he would not have my vote because I want a candidate I think has a chance of winning.

    Reply
  23. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 2:01 pm Said:

    He told an interviewer that his first wife was not young enough or attractive enough to be a President’s wife.

    Reply
  24. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 2:19 pm Said:

    I believe he is electable, and no I hadn’t heard or seen that particular quote he allegedly made.
    Conservatives didn’t lose in ‘06, Republicans did, and I believe we need a strong conservative to lead the charge. As for Guiliani, McCain, and a few others, I not only will not support them in the prelims, I won’t vote for them if they get the nomination. I’m not interested in moderates or squishies getting elected, and then hoping they see the light, and govern as a conservative. I would like to see Newt get elected, but even more, want to see the pure conservative agenda pushed to the front.

    Reply
  26. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 3:07 pm Said:

    Not ignoring, just reviewing all the things written about Newt in the 80s and 90s. That man has some major baggage, and I ain’t talkin’ about his bimbo problem.

    Reply
  27. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 6:53 pm Said:

    Yeah, he has some baggage, much of it contrived. The dhimmis hated, no hated, no even worse…hated Newt. He was able to bring down their Speaker, Fort Worth(less) Jim Wright, while the dhimmis had control of the game in Washington. They never forgot, and never gave up slamming him with anything and everything they could come up with, true or not. The fear was due to his passion for, and understanding of, conservativism and the American way of life. That was totally unacceptable to them, and is about the only thing that will motivate them to fight…politics.

    Reply
  28. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 7:29 pm Said:

    Ummmhmmmmm. Well, I checked his negative ratings on a girlfriend that stopped by on her way home, and SwampMan. Hardly a representative sample of the population with one being a rapid conservative Christian Republican and the other being an Independent. In both cases, I asked them if they would vote for Newt. Neither one remembered the possible conflicts of interest or the book deal (which will also be brought up again) or the bounced checks. Both of them said to the effect “isn’t he the guy that ditched his wife when she was in the hospital? No, I won’t vote for him.”

    He has a lot to overcome.

    Reply
  29. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 7:37 pm Said:

    So?
    I still want him to run, and he has my vote.

    Reply
  31. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:05 pm Said:

    So? You can want him to run and vote all you want. Several times. What would be really interesting is if Hillary and Newt end up being the winner of the nomination for their respective parties and the reaction of women who had a choice of voting for either Hillary (stand by your man for political purposes) or Newt (dump the old spouse because she isn’t decorative enough). Can’t wait to see how that would turn out, but I suspect we would be saying “Madam President”.

    Reply
  32. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:22 pm Said:

    I think Her Thighness, the female cuckold, loses big time if it’s her and Newt.

    Reply
  33. SwampWoman, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:32 pm Said:

    You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. Maybe Lieberman will run as a third-party candidate.

    Reply
  35. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:39 pm Said:

    Tom Delay on Air America.
    /henh

    Give it up folks. We know it must be a hard reality to face, but to us it seems high time to pull a Gregory Peck and order Jody to take the Yearling out into the woods and put it out of its misery.

    I must confess though, that I will personally miss the melodic voice of Ms. Randi Rhodes. Perhaps if I ever feel nostalgic I could jam an ice pick into my Eustachian tube. Oh man, here come the tears…I promised myself I wouldn’t do this…

    Reply
  36. nuke, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:47 pm Said:

    Dang. I thought Randi Rhodes was a guy.

    Reply
  37. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:53 pm Said:

    Nuke you are thinking of this Randy Rhoades.

    Reply
  38. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 8:59 pm Said:

    IN THE NAME FREEDOM AND TOLERANCE, AND IN HARMONY WITH OUR GAY MUSLIM BROTHERS AND SISTERS, WE PROUDLY ANNOUNCE THE FIRST MARCH TO MECCA, FEBRUARY 14, 2007

    Human Rights Watch, Moveon.org, ACT-UP, the Huffington Post and David Geffen are proud to present the March to Mecca, a celebration of peace that calls all gay brothers, sisters and people undergoing sex-reassignment to march to the holiest of holy cities, Mecca, the capital city of Saudi Arabia’s Makkah province on Valentine’s Day, February 14, 2007.
    Alrighty, then!
    Uhhh…there ain’t no infidels allowed in Mecca.

    Reply
  39. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 9:04 pm Said:

    Uhh…nuke, little help. I can’t access the post and correct the code.

    Reply
  42. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 9:45 pm Said:

    Henh…much better.
    Hey, more power to’em. We all know how tolerant, loving, and accepting of lifestyles antithetical to Grand Mal Moh are.

    Reply
  43. nuke, on December 18th, 2006 at 9:50 pm Said:

    Wonder what they’re going to do when the Wahabbi religious police give ‘em a butt stomping.

    Reply
  44. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:15 pm Said:

    If they do, using your terminology…party?
    /henh

    Reply
  45. no2liberals, on December 18th, 2006 at 10:18 pm Said:

    Did you hear about this guy and his research?
    Islam Based on Epileptic Prophecies, says Book From Iran-Native Neuropsychologist.
    It has been known or theorized, for sometime that this was true.
    Wonder if his affairs are in order, I hear sheetwrapped heads-a-poppin’.

    Reply
  46. nuke, on December 18th, 2006 at 11:07 pm Said:

    I saw that one. Heh. Makes sense to me.

    Reply
  47. Bonaduce B-Slap, Part 2 « Nuke’s news & views, on December 19th, 2006 at 9:41 pm Said:

    [...] And, in case you missed it, here is the link to the original youtube video from an earlier post. [...]

    Reply
  48. Eddie Treezy, on December 28th, 2006 at 11:01 pm Said:

    Anyone know how I can email Danny? I so want to thank him myself for stickin’ it to that little punk.

    Reply

Leave a Reply