Al Gore is on a mission. If he has his way, we could end up choosing a future, based on dubious claims, that could cost us, according to a U.N. estimate, $553 trillion over this century. Getting answers to hard questions is not an unreasonable expectation before we take his project seriously. It is crucial that we make the right decisions posed by the challenge of global warming. These are best achieved through open debate, and we invite him to take the time to answer our questions: We are ready to interview you any time, Mr. Gore–and anywhere.

It’s a brilliant book than the Dems don’t want you to read, by Bjorn Lomborg.

The big boogyman the green-weenies are referring to is, of course. carbon dioxide – a natural product of ALL combustion – including SUV’s, jets, forest fires AND living, breathing carbon based life forms. But wait – can there be anything worse for mother nature and her lesbian girlfriend Gaia than the e-vil carbon dioxide? Yes! Of course! It is methane gas – coming into the ring at TWENTY times more damaging to the environment in terms of a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and NOT a product of oxidative combustion!

This whole discussion about global warming is getting old. First, I really, really do have a lot more interesting things to do and share with you than WASTE any more time on this. Except for two issues, I’d turn away from this and never look back. But those two issues are overwhelmingly powerful and they are perhaps the reasons why I keep coming back to this.
One is that the deep stupidity of the global warming alarmists is so profound and their ignorance of basic science is so incredibly deep that it is hard not to ridicule them. I know – one should feel pity for the stupid – except the stupid are trying to base actual policy and public law on their lack of anything even resembling actual science. And two – I despise hypocrites. Most of these big name green-weeneis are burning enough fossil fuels every day than most people do in a lifetime. And their pathetic excuse for this is that “they are the decision makers who are making a difference” so that the rest of us can go live poorer lives in order that they can live in excess. I’d give them my advice in this, but most of it is physiologically impossible.

It’s a new, smarter and friendlier form of Stalinisim.